Court rules amnesty law on Troubles ‘in breach’ of human rights – Technologist

A British law granting immunity to combatants involved in the decades of sectarian violence in Northern Ireland known as “the Troubles” is not compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, a Belfast court ruled on Wednesday, February 28.

Victims of the violence launched the legal action challenging the law, which received royal assent in September despite widespread opposition from political parties, victims’ organizations, the Irish government and the Council of Europe. Following the ruling, it is now up to the UK parliament to decide whether to amend the controversial Troubles law or ignore it, which could prompt further legal action.

The law, first proposed by the ruling Conservative government in May 2022, calls for the creation of a truth and information recovery commission offering amnesty to British security personnel and paramilitaries if they cooperate with its inquiries. However, in its ruling, the Belfast High Court said there is no evidence the immunity provision will in any way contribute to reconciliation in Northern Ireland.

More than 3,500 people were killed during three decades of sectarian conflict that began in the 1960s over British rule in Northern Ireland. Around 1,200 deaths remain under investigation by police in the province, according to the UK government.

“I am satisfied that the immunity from prosecution provisions […] are in breach of the lead applicant’s rights pursuant to Article 2 of the ECHR,” judge Adrian Colton said. Article 2 of the convention affirms issues around the right to life. Colton also ruled that the law also breached Article 3 of the ECHR, which prohibits torture and outlaws “inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

However, the judge also said the new body set up to probe Troubles killings – the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR) – could proceed with human rights-compliant investigations. “The court is satisfied that the provisions of the Act leave sufficient scope for ICRIR to conduct an effective investigation as required under Articles 2 and 3 of ECHR,” he said. However, Colton noted “should it fall short” of these obligations, he expected further court scrutiny.

‘A very complex case’

Reacting in parliament, Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris said the government “remains committed” to implementing the law but needed more time to consider the court decision. “It is a very complex case, I am told the judgment runs to over 200 pages and I am yet to see it,” he told MPs. “It will take some time to consider,” Heaton-Harris adding, vowing to do so “very carefully.”

His ministry has previously insisted the new commission would have “necessary powers to conduct criminal investigations […] ensuring compliance with the government’s international obligations under the ECHR.”

Yet Hilary Benn, the main Labour opposition party’s Northern Ireland spokesman, questioned how it could now become operational “when one of its central powers has just been struck down.”

The Council of Europe, the continent’s leading human rights watchdog, last June said it had “serious concern” about the law, then still in draft stage. It had urged the UK to reconsider the immunity scheme, highlighting “the importance of gaining the confidence of victims, families and potential witnesses.”

The bill has drawn ire from the families of victims, both sides of Northern Ireland’s political divide and leaders in the Republic of Ireland. Ireland’s minister for further education Simon Harris said on Wednesday the court ruling appeared “positive from the perspective of the Irish government wanting to work to ensure that all families get justice.”